We have already seen that canonical transformations can rotate positions and momenta into each other. These labels, therefore, have no invariant meaning, and so it is helpful to adopt a more covariant notation: let $ \mathsf{a} $ take values in $ \left\lbrace 1, \cdots , 2N \right\rbrace $, such that

\[y ^{\mathsf{a} } = \begin{cases} q _ {a} \ , & \text{if} \quad 1 \leq \mathsf{a} \leq N \\ p ^{a} \ , & \text{if} \quad N+1 \leq \mathsf{a} \leq 2N \ . \end{cases}\]

Similarly, let $ \partial _ {\mathsf{a} } = \partial /\partial y ^{\mathsf{a} } $. In terms of these phase space coordinates $ y ^{\mathsf{a} } $, the fundamental Poisson brackets can now be written as \begin{equation} \label{eq:fund-pb} \left\lbrace y ^{\mathsf{a} }, y ^{\mathsf{b} } \right\rbrace = \epsilon ^{\mathsf{ab} } \ , \end{equation} where $ \epsilon $ is the constant antisymmetric $ 2N \times 2N $ matrix, written in terms of $ N \times N $ blocks as

\[\epsilon ^{\textsf{ab} } = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \mathbf{1} \\ -\mathbf{1} & 0 \end{pmatrix} \ .\]

This choice of coordinates is sometimes referred to as the Darboux coordinates. Hamilton’s equations can be rewritten as \begin{equation} \dot{y} ^{\mathsf{a} } = \left\lbrace y ^{\mathsf{a} }, H \right\rbrace = \epsilon ^{\mathsf{ab} } \, \partial _ {\mathsf{b} }H \ , \end{equation} and the Poisson brackets of any two functions can be written as \begin{equation} \left\lbrace A,B \right\rbrace = \epsilon ^{\mathsf{ab} }\,\partial _ {\mathsf{a} }A \,\partial _ {\mathsf{b} }B \ . \end{equation}

More generally, we will find it convenient to depart from strictly canonical coordinates on phase space that obey \eqref{eq:fund-pb} and instead work with coordinates that satisfy \begin{equation} \left\lbrace y ^{\mathsf{a} }, y ^{\mathsf{b} } \right\rbrace = \omega ^{\mathsf{ab} }(y) \ . \end{equation} The matrix $ \omega ^{\mathsf{ab} } $ is now not necessarily a constant, and can depend on the point in phase space where this Poisson bracket is being computed. From the antisymmetry of the Poisson bracket, we have that \begin{equation} \omega ^{\mathsf{ab} } = - \omega ^{\mathsf{ba} } \ . \end{equation} Further, we will insist on $ \omega ^{\mathsf{ab} } $ being invertible, and denote its inverse with lowered indices such that \begin{equation} \omega ^{\mathsf{ab} } \omega _ {\mathsf{bc} } = \delta ^{\mathsf{a} }_ {\mathsf{c} } \ . \end{equation} Finally, from the Jacobi identity we derive the following condition:

\[\begin{align} \left\lbrace y ^{a}, \left\lbrace y ^{b}, y ^{c} \right\rbrace \right\rbrace + \left\lbrace y ^{c}, \left\lbrace y ^{a}, y ^{b} \right\rbrace \right\rbrace + \left\lbrace y ^{b}, \left\lbrace y ^{c}, y ^{a} \right\rbrace \right\rbrace &= 0 \\ \Rightarrow \partial _ {\mathsf{a} } \omega _ {\mathsf{bc} } + \partial _ {\mathsf{c} } \omega _ {\mathsf{ab} } + \partial _ {\mathsf{b} } \omega _ {\mathsf{ca} } &= 0 \ . \end{align}\]

Taken together, we conclude that phase space comes equipped with a second-rank antisymmetric tensor $ \omega _ {\mathsf{ab} } $ that is everywhere invertible and satisfies Bianchi’s identity. This is called a symplectic manifold. The tensor $ \omega _ {\mathsf{ab} } $ may be thought of as analogous to the metric tensor on a Riemannian manifold, just as canonical transformations are analogous to coordinate transformations.

Categories:

Updated: